Mortal and Venial Sins

=============================================

Most Christians, including Catholics, accept the Bible's warning about falling from grace because of certain sins. When people fall from grace, Catholics say they have committed a "mortal sin," "mortal" because these kinds of absolutely depraved sins separate us from eternal life. ("Venial" sins are "lighter" sins. They do not separate us from eternal life, but they weaken our connection to it and pre-dispose us to commit greater sins.) Many Protestant theologians describe the reality of mortal sin as "the possibility of apostasy," even though they often don't claim to make the theological distinction between "mortal and venial sins," as Catholics do.

Most Calvinists and Baptists, on the other hand, believe in a false doctrine called "Eternal Security" or "Once Saved Always Saved" or "Preservation of the Saints." That false doctrine says that after you accept Christ, if you weren't pretending but you really believed, then you are incapable of going to hell. They say that no matter what sins a born-again Christian commits, none of them will stop him from going to heaven if he has sincerely "gotten saved" at any point in his life. One so-called Christian website wrongly says that it is even okay to commit suicide: "not even suicide can separate a Christian from God’s love," they misleadingly say. "Jesus died for all of our sins, and if a true Christian, in a time of spiritual attack and weakness, commits suicide, that would still be a sin covered by the blood of Christ." (http://www.gotquestions.org/suicide-Bible-Christian.html)

That is entirely misleading, it is based on a false Gospel and it has led many people to believe that they can ignore God's moral Law and do whatever they want. I have personal experience with Protestants who have taken this position, and when in a moral dilemma they often decide to sin since "it won't affect my salvation anyway," or so they think. I think this behavior is a direct result of the false security that this Protestant doctrine tries to infect good Christians with.

On this page I will prove that mortal sins do exist, and ipso facto, that "Eternal Security" is a false Gospel.


These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================


Revelation 22:18-19 proves that mortal sin exists and that we can fall from grace.




=============================================

































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

Revelation 22:
18 I warn every one who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if any one adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book,
19 and if any one takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.

=============================================

Argument:
God clearly states that if we have a share in heaven, it will be taken away from us if we deliberately change what the Book of Revelation says. Everyone agrees on these two points:
(a) if someone has a share in the tree of life and in the heavenly city, he is "saved."
(b) Anyone who has no share in the tree of life and the holy city is therefore "unsaved."
Well the Bible says,
(a) if someone is "saved" (i.e. if they have a share in the heavenly city), but they change what the Book of Revelation says,
(b) they will become "unsaved" (i.e. God will take away their share in the heavenly city). No one can deny that parallel.

Here's more proof from the same passsage: verse 18 says that God will "add" the plagues of hell to that person -- everyone agrees that if you are going to hell, you aren't "saved". But hell can only be "added" to someone who isn't already going there, i.e. to someone who is "saved." So since hell is "added" to someone, then he obviously becomes unsaved! It is very clear that Once Saved Always Saved is not happening here.

This also suggests that not all sins are equal. Think about it: if all sins were equal to this one, then every time you sin -- whether you tell a "white lie" or steal a pack of bubblegum -- every time you do the slightest thing against God's will, God takes away your share in heaven, so that (for example) a Christian who steals a stick of bubblegum and gets hit by a car as he is running away, before he repents, is destined for hell. Is that reasonable!? Of course not! Not every sin can take away your share in heaven, because if they all did that, then it would be senseless to warn us about one particular sin at the end of the Book of Revelation, at the end of the Bible! In other words, some sins might separate us from heaven, but some sins don't. The sins that do are called "mortal sins." The sins that don't we call "venial sins." This passage of the Book of Revelation proves that this distinction is biblical.

=============================================





































































=============================================

These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

Galatians 5:
19 Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness,
20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit,
21 envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

P.S.: Ephesians 5:5 says something similar: "Be sure of this, that no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God."

=============================================

Argument:
When you read this passage to a Calvinist or a Baptist, emphasize that last underlined part, and immediately ask him this simple question: "If a Christian does one of those things, shall he inherit the kingdom of God?" He should do one of three things in response: (1) he should repent of Eternal Security or at least say he'll think and pray about that passage, or (2) he might say that Christians never commit those sins (and anyone who does was never really Christian in the first place), or (3) he might say that the passage isn't talking about Christians.

In response to such claims, you should ask them where the Bible says either of those things. It doesn't. And it is irrational to read the passage in either of those ways: #3 is irrational because, if this warning doesn't apply to Christians, but only to unbelievers, then Paul said nothing to believers against getting drunk or fornicating or worshiping idols or practicing sorcery, and we don't have to worry about it if we do those things. But that is silly, and even the most conservative evangelical would admit it: Paul is warning a Christian community here. In Galatians 5:1, he specifies that he is talking about Christians: "Christ has set us free; stand fast therefore." The Christians he is talking about were sinning in all sorts of ways because they claimed to be "liberated" from the moral Law (Galatians 5:1-9). Paul says that such Christians are "severed from Christ," "fallen from grace." (Gal. 5:4) If they had never been a part of Christ, or had never accepted His grace, then it would be impossible to fall away from Him and be severed from someone they were never connected to. So Galatians 5 proves two things: (1) these were Christians, and (2) they had fallen from grace.

So much for #3, but objection #2 is just as irrational. Some Protestants will admit, after all of this, that it is a warning to Christians, but they'll say that real Christians are unable to commit those sins. But if we can't do those things anyway, then Paul had no reason to spend time warning us not to! But he did.

That leaves #1 -- repent of Eternal Security. It follows very simply from Galatians 5 that Christians can commit the sins of which Paul speaks, and are often tempted to. But if we do, then we forfeit the promise of heaven, in accordance with his words: "those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." It's not that hard to accept, you simply have to believe what the Bible says: Galatians 5:19-21 is a list of mortal sins, and the existence of mortal sins disproves Eternal Security. God be praised! Amen.

=============================================


































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

Matthew 18:
9 if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire.

P.S. Matthew 18:8 and Matthew 5:29-30 use the same words.

=============================================

Argument:
Jesus says two things: a person can (1) avoid sin and go to heaven, or (2) fall into sin and go to hell. #1 shows that this warning applies to believers, since only believers can get to heaven. #2 shows that they can still go to hell if they commit certain sins. So hell is still a possibility for believers, contrary to the false Protestant doctrine of "Preservation of the Saints." The sins that lead a person to hell are called "mortal sins." So this proves that mortal sins exist, and that "Eternal Security" doesn't.

=============================================



































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

John 15:
4 Remain united with me, and I will remain united with you. A branch can bear no fruit of itself, that is, when it is not united with the vine; no more can you, if you do not remain united with me.
5 I am the vine, you are the branches. One bears abundant fruit only when he and I are mutually united; severed from me, you can do nothing.
6 If one does not remain united with me, he is simply thrown away like a branch, and dries up. Such branches are gathered and thrown into the fire to be burned.

=============================================

Argument:
Bad news for "Once Saved Always Saved" -- Jesus warns us against severing ourselves away from Him! How can you do that? I thought that once you were attached you were always attached? I can only conclude that that must be false. Jesus is right, Once Saved Always Saved is wrong: (1) a Christian can sever himself from Christ, and (2) if he does he will end up in hell. (That is to say, it is a mortal sin to do so.)

=============================================




































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

James 1:
14 each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire.
15 Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin; and sin when it is full-grown brings forth death.

=============================================

Argument:
"Full-grown [sin] brings forth death," but not "smaller" sin. That proves that there are "smaller" sins and "greater" sins. "Mortal" sins and "venial" sins. Mortal or "full-grown" sins will kill your spiritual life, but "smaller" sins won't.

That also disproves Eternal Security: big sins kill off your spiritual life. Ask a Calvinist or a Baptist: "If a Christian does something abominably wicked, will he spiritually die?" If he believes in Eternal Security, he should tell you "no!" Then show him this passage and ask him why he contradicted it -- "Full-grown [sin] brings forth death," says the Bible, but he said he would NOT die from a huge sin. He might respond: "Well, if someone commits such a huge sin, then it means he was never really saved." But that contradicts the passage too -- it says that full-grown sin kills a man's spiritual life; but if he was never really saved, then he didn't have any spiritual life to be killed. So this passage proves that there is a difference between mortal and venial sin. The reality of mortal sin disproves Eternal Security. Praise the Lord!

=============================================




































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

1 John 5:
16 If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that.
17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal.

=============================================

Argument:
"There is sin which is mortal." If that doesn't prove the existence of mortal sin, then I don't know what does!

The part about not praying for very bad sinners is difficult, but there are good explanations. The best one I have seen is best encapsulated by Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Bible, which is (incidentally) a very non-Catholic, very Protestant commentary. It explains the meaning roughly this way: we should not pray that someone who is in mortal sin should, while he is still in mortal sin, be forgiven. Instead, we should ask God to give him the grace to repent. Forgiveness of mortal sins comes when they are repented of, so we can pray for that, but it would be presumptious to think our prayers are powerful enough to resurrect a spiritually dead soul without him accepting the healing, since only God has the power to resurrect.

=============================================




































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

2 Peter 2:
20 For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overpowered, the last state has become worse for them than the first.
21 For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them.
22 It has happened to them according to the true proverb, The dog turns back to his own vomit, and the sow is washed only to wallow in the mire.

P.S. Hebrews 10 says something similar:
26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
27 but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.
28 A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses.
29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

=============================================

Argument:
Protestants who believe in Eternal Security usually react to passages like these with one of two cop-outs: they will either say (1) that the people in question were never really saved, or (2) that they didn't really lose their salvation.

Both of those cop-outs are clearly snuffed by these two passages. (1) These guys were clearly saved. They "[had] escaped the defilements of the world," "[had known] our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ," "[had received] the knowledge of the truth," "[had] known the way of righteousness," "[had been] washed," and "[had been] sanctified." Plus, how could they "[have turned] back to [their] own vomit," if they had never really left it? How could they "[have turned] back from the holy commandment delivered to them," if they had never really received it? How could they have become "again entangled in [defilement]," if they were still entangled in defilement and had never really left it? How could there "no longer remain a sacrifice for sins," if the sacrifice hadn't cleansed them in the first place? How could they have been plunged into sin, if they hadn't first risen above it? How could "the last state [have] become worse for them than the first," if they were really in the first state all along?

So they were very clearly "saved." But they just as clearly lost it, (they committed a mortal sin,) which defeats the other cop-out that some Protestants try to use:

For, "[they now have] a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume [them]." How could that possibly describe the fate of those who are saved?? "The last state," says the Bible, "has become worse for them than the first," because they were no longer saved and they had less chance of returning to salvation. If Baptists want to say that they were still saved in their last state, then they would have the Bible saying that it is worse to be saved than to be damned! And in that case, they have turned God on His Head, and made heaven worse than hell. It is clear from this exercise that "Once Saved Always Saved" is absolutely foreign to the Gospel, and the reality of mortal sin is an essential doctrine.

=============================================






































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

2 Timothy 2:
11 This is a faithful saying:
If we have died with Him, we shall also live with Him.
12 If we persevere, we shall also reign with Him.
If we deny Him, He also will deny us.

P.S. Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, and Mark 13:13 use the same words: "He who perseveres to the end will be saved."

Romans 11:22 says something similar: "Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off."

Colossians 1:22-23 says this too: "he has now reconciled [you] in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and irreproachable before him, provided that you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel which you heard."

And John 8:31-32: "Jesus then said to the Jews who had believed in him, "If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free."

=============================================

Argument:
These passages prove that salvation is "conditional," i.e. it has a condition attached to it: we will be saved "if we persevere [with Him.]" Calvinists believe in something called "Unconditional Salvation," which falsely says that once you first have saving faith, there is nothing you will ever need to do after that to end up in heaven -- no "conditions" that you need to fulfill, they say, because God did it all for you when He gave you your faith and nothing on your part was necessary. I respond that all the passages quoted above, even every Scripture which says we must persevere in order to be saved, literally disproves "unconditional salvation" and shows it to be false, by setting up a condition that needs to be fulfilled in order for a believer to be saved.

Calvinists falsely say that persevering in salvation is so completely a result of becoming saved that being saved is not at all caused by our continued co-operation with grace. However, this is unbiblical because it implies that the "conditions to salvation" that the Bible so frequently talks about are not really meant; i.e. that "he who perseveres to the end" is not really saved because he persevered -- instead, he perseveres because he was saved.

It is not reasonable to read these passages that way for this reason: perseverance on our part is set up as a condition for being saved, not as a condition of being saved: "he who perseveres to the end will be saved," not "is already saved, and that eternally." Therefore, "Unconditional salvation" is false because the Bible says there is a condition to being saved. A person who has been born again into Christianity, but does not persevere, will not remain saved -- he loses his salvation. It is a mortal sin to refuse to persevere in God's grace, and he who commits this sin rejects God and refuses salvation -- he will not go to heaven.

=============================================






























































































These are specific passages in the Bible that prove the Catholic doctrine of mortal sin!

=============================================

I found an article (http://www.cin.org/users/james/loss.htm) by Catholic evangelist Jimmy Akin where he has posted dozens and dozens of passages that teach directly against Eternal Security; I will quote him at length here (his words will be in bold green) because his Scriptural smorgasbord was simply so impressive to me. (Note: some of the Scriptures he comments on may be repeats of ones that I have posted here.)

In Matt. 18:21-35, Jesus tells us that that if we do not forgive others God will do to each one of us what happened to the unmerciful servant, namely, that after initially being forgiven we will be unforgiven and delivered over to the jailors until we can pay all of our infinite debt.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that if we end unforgiven then we must never have been forgiven in the first place.

In Luke 8:13, Jesus tells us that there are some who receive the word with joy but, because they have no root, they believe for a while and in time of temptation fall away.

Bu

t

[Eternal Security]

c

laims that they never believed in the first place and that it is impossible for anyonewho believed to fall away in time of temptation.

In Luke 12:42-46, Jesus tells us that you can start out as a "faithful and wise" steward of his (and the Greek word for "faithful" is pistos), then begin to mistreat your fellow Christians and eat and drink and get drunk, and then when Jesus returns be punished and assigned a place with the unfaithful.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that anyone who will be assigned a place with the unfaithful must have been unfaithful from the beginning, meaning that he was never a
faithful and wise steward to begin with, as Jesus said he was.

In Luke 15:11-32, Jesus tells the parable of the prodigal son, in which one of the sons of the Father leaves home, is twice described by his father as being "dead" and then returns home and is spoken of by the Father as being "alive again."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for one of the sons of the Father to be "alive again" because no son of the Father can ever leave home and become "dead."

In John 6:66-71, Jesus says that he chose or elected the twelve, yet one of them--Judas--was a devil, proving that not all choosing or election is a choosing or election to perseverance.

Yet

[Eternal Security]

denies this and claims that all election is election to perseverance.

In John 15:1-10, Jesus says that he is the vine and we are the branches and that if we do not bear fruit we will be cut out of him, wither up, and finally be burned in the fire.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for any branch to be cut out of Jesus and thrown into the fire, and that every branch in Jesus automatically bears fruit.

In John 17:12, Jesus says that he had lost none of those the Father had given to him except for Judas.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that that nobody who the Father has given to Jesus can ever be lost.

In Romans 8:13, Paul warns his audience of Christians that if they live according to the flesh they will die.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for Christians to live according to the flesh.

In Romans 11:20-33, Paul says that Jews were broken off of the tree of God's spiritual Israel because of unbelief, and that we retain our place in it only be believing, so we should be afraid because God will not spare us if we disbelieve anymore than he spared the natural branches.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that no one can ever be cut out of God's spiritual Israel and that it is impossible for us to disbelieve.

In Romans 14:15-23, Paul tells us that we must not, by what we eat, ruin others for whom Christ died.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that those for whom Christ died can never be ruined no matter what we do.

In the same passage, Paul tells us that we must not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God by making our brother Christian fall.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible to destroy the work of God under any circumstances and that no brother Christian can ever fall.

In 1 Cor. 9:23-27, Paul tells us that not every runner who runs in the race will receive a prize and that he pommels his body to subdue it, lest after preaching salvation to others he himself would be disqualified.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that you can't even join the race of salvation unless you're going to win a prize, and that if Paul was ever a true athelete in this race it would be impossible for him to be disqualified.

In 1 Cor. 10:12, Paul says, "Therefore let any one who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible for anyone to fall. It would be impossible for true Christians to fall because they will all persevere, and it would be impossible for false Christians to fall because they were never standing in the first place. Furthermore, false Christians should be encouraged to fall from their false Christianity so they can embrace true Christianity!

In 1 Cor. 15:1-2, Paul tells us that we will be saved by the gospel if we hold it fast, unless we believe in vain.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that if we believed at all we cannot help but holding fast to the gospel and that it is impossible for anyone to believe in vain because saving faith is never in vain and non-saving faith is not true belief in the first place and never would have helped us.

In 2 Cor. 11:2-4, Paul says that he betrothed his audience to Christ like a pure bride, but that they were in danger of being seduced by the serpent, just like Eve, and that they had submitted readily to a different Christ and a different gospel.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for anyone today to do what Eve did and fall from a state of grace, and having once accepted the true Christ and the true gospel turn aside to a false Christ and a false gospel.

In 2 Cor. 12:5, Paul says that you must examine yourself to see if we are holding "to your faith."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that if you are not holding to your faith, you never had faith to begin with.

In Gal. 5:1-4, Paul says that anyone who is circumcized becomes severed from Christ and has fallen from grace.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible to be severed from Christ and impossible to fall from grace.

In Gal. 6:7-9, Paul tells us that we will reap a harvest of eternal life if we do not lose heart and grow weary in working good.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that anyone who does lose heart and grow weary in working good was never going to reap a harvest of eternal life in the first place.

In Phil 3:12, Paul says that he has not yet obtained the resurrection from the dead but that he presses on to make it his own because Christ has made him his own.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that anyone who Christ has made his own already has the resurrection from the dead and if you are trying to press on to make the resurrection yours then you do not belong to Christ.

In Col. 1:21-23, Paul tells us that we were once hostile to God but have not been reconciled and will be presented holy and blameless provided we continue in our faith and not shifting from the hope of the gospel.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims anyone who does not continue in his faith aways was hostile and never was reconciled. He also says it is impossible to shift from the hope of the gospel and that anyone who appears to shift never had the hope of the gospel in the first place.

In Col. 2:18-19, Paul says that a man puffed by without reason by his sensuous mind has lost connection with the head of the Body, Jesus Christ, from which the whole body grows.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible to lose connection with the head of the Body and that if you do not now have connection with the head, you never did.

In 1 Tim. 1:5-6, Paul says that some people have wandered away from a sincere faith, a pure heart, and a good conscience.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for anyone to wander away from a good conscience, a pure heart, and especially a sincere faith.

In 1 Tim. 1:19-20, Paul tells Timothy he must hold fast his faith not not make a shipwreck of his faith like Hymenaeus and Alexander.

But

[Eternal Security]

would say Hymenaeus and Alexander never had faith to shipwreck, and that if Timothy ever did have faith, he could not shipwreck it.

In 1 Tim. 4:1, Paul tells us that the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that the Spirit will never let anyone depart from the faith.

In 1 Tim. 5:8, Paul says that if any one does not provide for his relatives, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to disown the faith and be worse than an unbeliever.

In 1 Tim. 6:10, Paul says that for the love of riches some have wandered from the faith.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to wander away fom the faith, for if you aren't in the faith now, you never had it.

In 1 Tim. 6:18-19, Paul says we "are to work good, to be rich in good works, liberal and generous, thus laying up for themselves a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of the life which is life indeed."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims anyone who has believe has already laid hold of that life and that if we try to lay hold of it by working good and being rich in good works that we have embraced a false gospel and never had the true faith.

In Heb. 2:1 the divinely inspired author tellsus "Therefore we must pay the closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to drift away, because if we accepted what we heard we cannot drift away and if we didn't accept what we heard then we again can't drift away because we never had it.

In Heb. 3:12, the divinely inspired author tells us, "Take care, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to fall away from the living God.

In Heb. 6:4-6, the divinely inspired author tells us that "those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit" can fall away.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that no one who has been enlightened and become a partaker of the Holy Spirit can ever fall away.

In Heb. 10:23-29, the divinely inspired author tells us, "Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering", "For if we [go on sinning] deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries. How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?"

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that if you were sanctified by Christ's blood at all then it is imposible for you to not fold fast to your confession, and impossible for you to go one sinning wilfully, and impossible for you to enter the fury of fire which will consume Christ's adversaried.

In Heb. 10:35, the divinely inspired author tells us "Therefore do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible for us to throw away our confidence.

In Jas. 5:19-20, James tellsus that "if any one among you wanders from the truth and some one brings him back, let him know that whoever brings back a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for anyone to wander from the truth.

In 2 Pet. 1:5-11, Peter tells us to "make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with knowledge...for if you do this you will never fall; so there will be richly provided for you an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that if we make an effort to do anything at all, we have embraced a false gospel and will be denied an entrance into the eternal kingdom of Christ.

In 2 Pet. 2:1, Peter tells us that "there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for anyone Jesus bought to ever deny him and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

In 2 Pet. 2:20-22, Peter tells us that the false teachers promise freedom, "if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overpowered, the last state has become worse for them than the first. For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them. It has happened to them according to the true proverb, The dog turns back to his own vomit, and the sow is washed only to wallow in the mire."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to escape the defilements of the world through a knowledge of Jesus Christ and then turn back. [It] says it is impossible to know the way of righteousness and then turn back. He says it is impossible to be washed from your sins and yet return to wallowing in the mire. Yet Peter says "It has happened to them according to the true proverb."

In 2 Pet. 3:16-17, Peter says that "the ignorant and unstable twist [the Scriptures] to their own destruction... You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, beware lest you be carried away with the error of lawless men and lose your own stability."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible to lose your stability and be carried away to destruction. ...

In 1 John 2:28, John tells us, "And now, little children, abide in him, so that when he appears we may have confidence and not shrink from him in shame at his coming."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that it is impossible for us
not to abide in him, making John's command meaningless. It can't be a warning to false Christians because it would tell false Christians to remain in the illusion that they are in Christ.

In Rev. 3:4, Jesus says that in Sardis there were a few people who have not soiled their garments; and they shall walk with him in white, for they are worthy.

Yet

[Eternal Security]

claims that it if you ever receive a white garment it is impossible to ever soil it.

In Rev. 3:5, Jesus says that He who conquers shall be clad thus in white garments, and I will not blot his name out of the book of life. And in Exodus 32:33, God said he would blot out of his book whoever sinned.

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to be blotted out of the book if you were ever in it.

In Rev. 3:11, Jesus tells his readers, "I am coming soon; hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims that we can never lose what we have and that no one can ever steal our crown.

In Rev. 22:19, John discusses the scroll of the book of Revelation and says, "if any one takes away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this scroll."

But

[Eternal Security]

claims it is impossible to have your share of the tree of life taken away and your share in the holy city taken away.

Besides these verses which I have quickly surveyed, there are dozens of others which teach the same truth, all of which my opponent has to deny and find some way to squirm his way out of.

I'm just telling you what Scripture says. You don't have to be an Einstein to see that this is the plain teaching of Scripture.

But the writers of the New Testament knew that some would come who would try to deny exactly this teaching. That is why they continually uttered the warning, "Do not be deceived."

Even though Paul tells his audience that they have been washed and sanctified and justified, he still finds it necessary to warn them, in 1 Cor. 6:9-10, saying, "Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Why would he warn them about this if they were in not in danger of, as Peter said actually happened, returning to wallowing in themire after having been washed? Why would he warn them not to be deceived if there were not certain individuals who would come to them and try to deceive them by telling them the lie, the lie O so pleasing to our itching ears in these latter days, that we can never lose our salvation?

I'm telling you what Paul is telling you: Do not be deceived. Do not embrace that lie that has sent so many millions of souls straight to hell by telling them they can never fall, that same doctrine which my opponent is trying to force upon you even tonight.

I'm telling you: You had better get in a Church that will be honest with you about the reality of mortal sin. And you had better get in a Church that will tell you how to discern which sins are mortal and which are not. And most especially, you had better get in a Church that will tell you what to do once you have fallen and committed a mortal sin. The safety of your soul requires it.

Back to top
=============================================



































































Back to top
=============================================